Skip to content

Illustrative reference model

Knowledge Graph Reference Model

A reviewable structure for defining enterprise entities, typed relationships, source authority, context services, and the controls needed to expose connected context to AI and business applications.

Reference-model statusIllustrative design, not a deployed client architecture. Domain concepts, source authority, identity rules, relationship meaning, platform choices, permissions, and operating controls are adapted to the engagement.

Model structure

Six records connect business meaning to application context.

The reference model is intended to make the design discussable before implementation. It names the records required to understand what the graph covers, what it relies on, what consumers may ask of it, and how change and exceptions are governed.

01

Domain boundary

The business domain, use cases, decisions, and consuming systems the model is intended to support.

02

Source register

Approved records, identifiers, ownership, access conditions, freshness expectations, and permitted uses.

03

Entity model

Entity types, stable identifiers, aliases, matching rules, confidence, ownership, and lifecycle states.

04

Relation contract

Typed relationships with direction, meaning, validity, evidence, confidence, and constraints on use.

05

Context services

Queries, retrieval paths, policy checks, lineage views, context assembly, and integration interfaces.

06

Operating record

Versions, stewardship decisions, quality findings, exceptions, changes, usage, and review dates.

Reference diagram

The context path stays connected to its source and governing record.

Source records resolve into entities and typed relationships. Context services expose selected paths to consuming applications. Provenance, permissions, versioning, stewardship, and quality controls operate across the model rather than being inferred by each consumer.

Relation contract

A relationship is an operating claim with named evidence and constraints.

A line between two nodes is only useful when its meaning can be reviewed. The relation contract defines what the edge means, where it came from, when it applies, who governs it, and which applications may rely on it.

Required fields

  • Subject and object entity types
  • Relationship name, direction, and business meaning
  • Authoritative source and supporting evidence
  • Effective dates, status, and confidence
  • Permission, policy, and jurisdiction constraints
  • Steward, review date, and exception path

ILLUSTRATIVE RELATION CONTRACT

SubjectPolicy
Relationshipgoverns
ObjectBusiness process
EvidenceApproved policy record
ValidityEffective date + status
StewardNamed business owner

Context views

Applications receive a governed view, not unrestricted access to the full graph.

A context view defines the entities, relationship types, depth, source requirements, policy checks, freshness, and response fields permitted for a particular task. Different users and applications may receive different views of the same underlying model because their authority and operating purpose differ.

CONTEXT VIEW CONTRACT

01Consumer identity and purpose
02Allowed entity and relation types
03Traversal depth and query limits
04Source and freshness requirements
05Policy and permission checks
06Lineage returned with the response

Governance and operating record

Track the decisions that change meaning, identity, and permitted use.

Graph governance is not limited to technical schema review. It includes business definitions, identity disputes, source changes, relationship exceptions, policy updates, quality findings, consumer dependencies, and the migration path when a model version changes.

RecordDecision controlledEvidence retained
Ontology version

Approve a meaning or structure change

Proposal, reviewers, impact, effective date

Identity exception

Merge, split, reject, or defer an entity match

Source records, confidence, steward decision

Relation exception

Accept, limit, correct, or remove a relationship

Affected edges, evidence, scope, correction

Context-view release

Publish a view to a consuming application

Policy checks, test results, owner approval

Source change

Continue, remap, or suspend affected context

Source version, lineage impact, re-verification

What the engagement defines

Adapted before implementation

  • Domain boundary, priority decisions, tasks, and consuming applications
  • Entity, relationship, identity, evidence, and source-authority rules
  • Context views, permissions, policy checks, and lineage expectations
  • Stewardship, quality, versioning, exception, and review processes
  • Platform evaluation criteria and integration constraints

Implementation-dependent

Proven with the selected environment

  • Whether available source records can support the required identity and relationship claims
  • Whether the selected platform can meet query, scale, latency, security, and operating needs
  • Whether context views can enforce required permissions and policy decisions
  • Whether lineage, freshness, quality, and exception records can be retained at the required level
  • Whether consuming applications can use the context safely within the bounded task

Illustrative relation set

SubjectRelationshipObjectEvidence
Business unitownsApplicationSystem registry
ApplicationprocessesData productLineage record
PolicygovernsBusiness processApproved policy
Contractapplies toCustomer accountAgreement record
Agent taskmay useContext viewAccess policy

Use the reference model

Judge the context design before committing to the graph implementation.

The model shows the structure Graph42 would adapt. A working session can determine whether the use case warrants a graph, which domain and sources belong in the first slice, and which claims can realistically be governed and inspected in the target environment.